The Move That Changed the Game: What AlphaGo Taught Us About Engineering with AI
- Patrick Law
- Jun 11
- 2 min read
In 2016, a quiet revolution happened—not in a lab, not in a factory, but on a Go board.
World champion Lee Sedol sat across from AlphaGo, an AI trained by DeepMind. For a while, the match looked normal. Then came Move 37.
The move was so unexpected, Sedol chuckled. It didn’t follow convention. It wasn’t logical by human standards. But it worked. And it changed everything.
AlphaGo went on to win the match—and the series. For engineers watching, that moment marked more than a victory in a board game. It showed what AI can do when it’s allowed to think differently.
Beyond the Board: The Engineering Lesson in Move 37
AlphaGo didn’t win with brute force. It combined deep learning with a simulation method called Monte Carlo Tree Search. It ran millions of scenarios and picked strategies that humans wouldn’t even consider.
This is exactly the kind of thinking engineers need when solving complex problems—designing systems, choosing layouts, or modeling uncertainty.
Instead of relying on gut feel or a few options, AI can scan thousands of possibilities and surface the smartest ones. Move 37 wasn’t magic. It was computation, creativity, and clarity combined.
But AlphaGo Wasn’t Perfect
The flip side? AlphaGo ran on massive computing power. And even when it made a brilliant move, its creators couldn’t fully explain why.
In engineering, that’s not good enough.
When your output affects safety margins, compliance, and costs, “we’re not sure why it did that” doesn’t cut it. Transparency matters. So does control.
Our Reality at Singularity
We’re not AlphaGo.
We’re Lee Sedol.
We’re showing up each day, facing powerful AI tools that surprise us, confuse us, and—at times—fail on us. Our prompts crash. Our models misfire. But every misstep makes us smarter.
Each error helps us refine how we use AI—not as a magic fix, but as a guided force. We’re not trying to beat it. We’re learning how to direct it.
Because engineering isn’t a board game. It’s messier. Riskier. And more rewarding.
So Where Are We Now?
AI hasn’t solved engineering. But it has changed the way we think about solving.
We’re still testing. Still debugging. Still learning.
But if Move 37 taught us anything, it’s that the best ideas often come from the unexpected. We just have to be ready to see them—and brave enough to use them.
👉 Want to follow how we’re using AI in real engineering workflows?
Subscribe to our newsletter:https://www.singularityengineering.ca/general-4

Comments