Is AI Making Engineers Lazy?
- Patrick Law
- Jun 25
- 2 min read
Remember when doing long division by hand proved your numeracy? Today, using ChatGPT to draft your technical reports feels just as natural—but could it be quietly undermining your engineering expertise?
Why “Cognitive Debt” Matters A recent MIT study found that heavy reliance on ChatGPT can lead to lower neural engagement—what researchers call “cognitive debt.” Participants who leaned on AI to write essays showed flatter EEG patterns, poorer recall of key details, and a diminished sense of ownership over their work. In engineering, where precision and deep understanding are non-negotiable, that debt can translate into forgotten assumptions, unchecked errors, and missed optimization opportunities.
Embrace AI for Routine, Guard Your Core Skills AI shines brightest handling repetitive, time-consuming tasks:
Drafting summaries of P&IDs or control-logic descriptions
Converting complex equations into clear, stakeholder-friendly language
Generating first-pass design or mass-balance reports
Freeing yourself from these chores unlocks time for high-value activities—if you don’t let critical thinking slip away.
A Hybrid Workflow to Keep Your Edge
Sketch First, Polish Later Do core calculations and problem-solving by hand or in your preferred tools. Then feed your draft into ChatGPT to refine language and formatting.
Self-Quiz Before You Finalize Challenge your own assumptions: Can you explain every number, safety margin, and control parameter without looking? If not, dive back in.
Demand the “Why” from AI Instead of “Write my report,” prompt ChatGPT to outline its reasoning steps—how it sized that reactor, why it selected those pump curves, or what safety factors it applied.
This blend of manual rigor and AI-driven efficiency lets you harness speed without sacrificing mastery.
Building Long-Term AI Fluency Today’s engineers must be as fluent with AI as they are with process simulators. That means:
Knowing when to offload grunt work
Understanding how to validate AI outputs
Cultivating the judgment to decide which tasks demand human creativity
Over time, this strategic partnership will redefine what “hands-on expertise” means—just as calculators reshaped numeracy in the 1970s.
Conclusion & CTAAI will never replace the deep domain knowledge and critical thinking that underpin safe, optimized process engineering. But by offloading routine chores and enforcing engagement checkpoints, you can enjoy the best of both worlds: lightning-fast drafts and rock-solid understanding.
Want faster workflows and smarter AI strategies? Subscribe for more at https://www.singularityengineering.ca/general-4.

Comments